JEFFERSON CITY – A bill that aims to prohibit antisemitism within public schools and institutions of higher education was initially approved Wednesday by the House.
Rep. George Hruza, …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your member account, or purchase a new membership.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for becoming a member.
Please log in to continue |
|
JEFFERSON CITY – A bill that aims to prohibit antisemitism within public schools and institutions of higher education was initially approved Wednesday by the House.
Rep. George Hruza, R-St.Louis, the descendant of a Holocaust survivor, sponsored House Bill 2061 because he feared for the safety of Jewish students in the years since the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel.
“That Missouri Jewish students are blamed for what is happening in Israel and Gaza is absurd,” Hruza said. “They have absolutely no input or control over what is happening there.”
He claims that the attack and subsequent war have sparked an uptick in antisemitic acts across the country.
“Within hours,” Hruza claimed, “Antisemitic protests against jews and acts of violence against jews erupted and escalated. Especially on college campuses.”
The bill establishes a standard definition for antisemitism to be used by educators to decide what qualifies. Any incident in violation of that definition must be reported under Title VI, a component of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This would allow researchers to track the trends of antisemitism inside Missouri’s school systems.
The bill was initially approved on the House floor despite strong opposition from Democrats who fear it will prevent open discussion in schools, and concerns that it disregards other forms of hate speech.
“As a teacher, I am deeply concerned with this bill.” Rep. Elizabeth Fuchs, D-St. Louis, said. “What we are discussing is a way to silence the voice of teachers, using being labeled as an antisemite as a vehicle.”
She went on to say that the bill would prevent educators from bringing up current events, like Israel or Palestine, out of fear of being labeled antisemitic.
Fuchs said that she was a professor during the Oct. 7 attacks and had both Israeli and Palestinian students.
“My job as an educator was to find a path to talk about it,” she said. “To bring both of the communities together to a table to have a conversation. This bill … would create a pause for professors and teachers.”
Rep. Bridget Walsh Moore, D-St. Louis, claimed that the passing of the bill would result in antisemitic incidents being treated with more severity than other kinds of discrimination.
“You see how it’s creating a hierarchy? How some things are worse than others?” asked Moore. “Because this is going to be reported to the state, but if you’re called the N-word and someone pulls your braids, well, that’s gonna be an in-school suspension.”
The House adopted a proposed amendment by Rep. Bill Hardwick, R-Dixon, that would prevent any instances of religious or political speech protected under the First Amendment from being reported, compiled or published.
After questioning from Rep. Mark Boyko, D-Kirkwood, Hardwick confirmed that the potentially controversial acts of burning an Israeli flag or wearing an arm band in support of Palestine would not be considered antisemitic under this definition.
A similar bill passed the House last year, but never made it to the Senate floor for a vote. HB 2061 will be voted on once more by the House, before being passed on to the Senate if approved.