COVID-19 vaccine still partisan issue in House

By Alyse Pfeil, Missouri New Network
Posted 3/21/23

JEFFERSON CITY — More than three years since the designation of COVID-19 as a pandemic, Missouri House members spent part of Tuesday afternoon debating whether COVID-19 vaccines save …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

COVID-19 vaccine still partisan issue in House

Posted

JEFFERSON CITY — More than three years since the designation of COVID-19 as a pandemic, Missouri House members spent part of Tuesday afternoon debating whether COVID-19 vaccines save lives.

House Bill 700 would prohibit public schools and public agencies from implementing COVID-19 vaccine requirements.

The bill would require universities and private sector employers who have COVID-19 vaccines requirements to grant exemptions to students and employees who hold a “sincerely held religious belief” or have a written recommendation from a licensed physician. Sponsored by Rep. Bill Hardwick, R-Waynesville, it is similar to a bill he introduced last year.

The House floor debate revealed the persistence of a stark partisan divide on COVID-19 topics. Democrats opposed the bill, arguing that health experts who say COVID-19 vaccines save lives should be trusted. Republican supporters of the legislation cast doubt on the efficacy and safety of vaccines.

Rep. Michael Burton, D-Lakeshire, opposed the bill during floor debate. “From what all the health professionals have told us ... these COVID vaccines have saved millions of lives,” he said.

Burton asked Rep. Lisa Thomas, R-Lake Ozark, a psychiatrist, if she believes COVID-19 vaccines have saved lives.

“It’s possible,” Thomas replied. “But I don’t see a tremendous amount of data in that respect ... It does not prevent you from getting the illness or passing it on.”

Bill sponsor Hardwick said he was unsure if COVID-19 vaccines have saved more lives than they’ve taken.

Later, Rep. Patty Lewis, D-Kansas City, a nurse, said that it is necessary to lean on guidance from health experts like epidemiologists for information about COVID-19 and encouraged her colleagues to vote “no” on the bill.

The bill ultimately received preliminary House approval on a voice vote despite vocal opposition.